In the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic we observed great discrepancies in both infection and mortality rates between countries. Besides the biological and epidemiological factors, a multitude of social and economic criteria also influence the extent to which these discrepancies appear. Consequently, there is an active debate regarding the critical socio-economic and health factors that correlate with the infection and mortality rates outcome of the pandemic. Here, we leverage Bayesian model averaging techniques and country level data to investigate the potential of 28 variables, describing a diverse set of health and socio-economic characteristics, in being correlates of the final number of infections and deaths during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic. We show that only few variables are able to robustly correlate with these outcomes. To understand the relationship between the potential correlates in explaining the infection and death rates, we create a Jointness Space. Using this space, we conclude that the extent to which each variable is able to provide a credible explanation for the COVID-19 infections/mortality outcome varies between countries because of their heterogeneous features.
翻译:在COVID-19大流行的最初一波中,我们观察到各国之间在感染和死亡率方面存在巨大差异。除了生物和流行病学因素外,许多社会和经济标准也影响到这些差异的出现程度。因此,对与该流行病的感染和死亡率结果相关的关键社会经济和健康因素进行了积极辩论。在这里,我们利用贝叶斯模式平均技术和国家一级数据来调查28个变量的潜力,描述了一套不同的健康和社会经济特点,与科诺病毒大流行第一波中感染和死亡的最终人数相关联。我们表明,只有少数变量能够与这些结果紧密相关。为了了解在解释感染和死亡率方面的潜在关联关系,我们创建了一个共同空间。我们的结论是,利用这一空间,每个变量能够为COVID-19感染/死亡率结果提供可信解释的程度因国而异。