Mediation analysis is an important statistical tool in many research fields. Particularly, the Sobel test and joint significance test are two popular statistical test methods for mediation effects when we perform mediation analysis in practice. However, the drawback of both mediation testing methods is arising from the conservative type I error, which has reduced their powers and imposed restrictions on their popularity and usefulness. As a matter of fact, this limitation is long-standing for both methods in the medation analysis literature. To deal with this issue, we propose the adaptive Sobel test and adaptive joint significance test for mediation effects, which have significant improvements over the traditional Sobel and joint significance test methods. Meanwhile, our method is user-friendly and intelligible without involving more complicated procedures. The explicit expressions for sizes and powers are derived, which ensure the theoretical rationality of our method. Furthermore, we extend the proposed adaptive Sobel and joint significance tests for multiple mediators with family-wise error rate control. Extensive simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of our mediation testing procedure. Finally, we illustrate the usefulness of our method by analysing three real-world datasets with continuous, binary and time-to-event outcomes, respectively.
翻译:在许多研究领域,调解分析是一个重要的统计工具。 特别是,索贝尔测试和共同意义测试是我们在实践中进行调解分析时对调解效果的两种流行性统计测试方法。然而,这两种调解测试方法的缺点都源于保守的I型错误,这种错误降低了他们的权力,限制了他们的受欢迎度和作用。事实上,这两种方法在医学分析文献中都存在这一限制。为了处理这一问题,我们提议对调解效果进行适应性Sobel测试和适应性共同意义测试,这些测试大大改进了传统的索贝尔和共同意义测试方法。与此同时,我们的方法对用户友好而且容易理解,而不涉及更复杂的程序。提出了大小和权力的明确表述,确保了我们方法的理论合理性。此外,我们扩展了拟议的适应性Sobel和联合重要性测试,用于控制家庭错率的多个调解人。我们进行了广泛的模拟,以评价我们的调解测试程序的业绩。最后,我们通过分析三个真实世界数据集,分别以连续、二元和时间到时间的结果来说明我们的方法的效用。