Despite pronouncements about the inevitable diffusion of artificial intelligence and autonomous technologies, in practice it is human behavior, not technology in a vacuum, that dictates how technology seeps into -- and changes -- societies. In order to better understand how human preferences shape technological adoption and the spread of AI-enabled autonomous technologies, we look at representative adult samples of US public opinion in 2018 and 2020 on the use of four types of autonomous technologies: vehicles, surgery, weapons, and cyber defense. By focusing on these four diverse uses of AI-enabled autonomy that span transportation, medicine, and national security, we exploit the inherent variation between these AI-enabled autonomous use cases. We find that those with familiarity and expertise with AI and similar technologies were more likely to support all of the autonomous applications we tested (except weapons) than those with a limited understanding of the technology. Individuals that had already delegated the act of driving by using ride-share apps were also more positive about autonomous vehicles. However, familiarity cut both ways; individuals are also less likely to support AI-enabled technologies when applied directly to their life, especially if technology automates tasks they are already familiar with operating. Finally, opposition to AI-enabled military applications has slightly increased over time.
翻译:尽管有关人工智能和自主技术不可避免地扩散的宣言,但实际应用中,决定技术渗透和改变社会的是人类行为,而不是孤立的技术。为了更好地了解人类偏好如何塑造技术采用和AI-enabled自主技术的传播,我们观察了代表性的美国公众对四种自主技术使用的意见,分别是:交通工具、手术、武器和网络防御的成年样本。通过关注这四个多样化的AI-enabled自主用例,涵盖交通、医学和国家安全领域,我们利用这些自主应用之间固有的差异。我们发现,那些熟悉并具有AI和类似技术专业知识的人比那些对技术了解有限的人更有可能支持我们测试的所有自主应用(除了武器)。使用打车应用程序委托驾驶的个人也更积极地支持自主车辆。然而,熟悉性两面性并存;特别是如果技术自动化他们已经熟悉的任务,个人也不太可能支持AI-enabled技术。最后,对于AI-enabled军事应用的反对意见略有增加。