Universal Domain Adaptation aims to transfer the knowledge between the datasets by handling two shifts: domain-shift and category-shift. The main challenge is correctly distinguishing the unknown target samples while adapting the distribution of known class knowledge from source to target. Most existing methods approach this problem by first training the target adapted known classifier and then relying on the single threshold to distinguish unknown target samples. However, this simple threshold-based approach prevents the model from considering the underlying complexities existing between the known and unknown samples in the high-dimensional feature space. In this paper, we propose a new approach in which we use two sets of feature points, namely dual Classifiers for Prototypes and Reciprocals (CPR). Our key idea is to associate each prototype with corresponding known class features while pushing the reciprocals apart from these prototypes to locate them in the potential unknown feature space. The target samples are then classified as unknown if they fall near any reciprocals at test time. To successfully train our framework, we collect the partial, confident target samples that are classified as known or unknown through on our proposed multi-criteria selection. We then additionally apply the entropy loss regularization to them. For further adaptation, we also apply standard consistency regularization that matches the predictions of two different views of the input to make more compact target feature space. We evaluate our proposal, CPR, on three standard benchmarks and achieve comparable or new state-of-the-art results. We also provide extensive ablation experiments to verify our main design choices in our framework.
翻译:通用域适应方案的目的是通过处理两个转变,即域档和类别档,在数据集之间转让知识。主要挑战在于正确区分未知的目标样本,同时调整从源到目标的已知类知识的分布。大多数现有方法都解决这一问题,先对目标经过调整的分类师进行培训,然后依靠单一阈值来区分未知的目标样本。然而,这种简单的门槛法使模型无法考虑高维特征空间已知和未知样本之间的内在复杂性。在本文件中,我们提出了一种新选择,我们使用两组特征点,即原型和互惠(CPR)的双重分类器。我们的主要想法是将每个原型与相应的已知类特征挂钩,同时将这些原型与这些原型分开,将其定位于潜在的未知特征空间空间。然后,目标样本如果在测试时间接近任何对应点,则被归类为未知。为了成功培训我们的框架,我们收集了在拟议的多标准选择中被分类为已知或未知的部分、可靠的目标样本。我们随后又将两种原型损失分类方法与相应的分类方法结合起来,我们进一步将标准性设计标准参数的常规化,我们又进行更精确地评估。