Since the 1990s, AI systems have achieved superhuman performance in major zero-sum games where "winning" has an unambiguous definition. However, most social interactions are mixed-motive games, where measuring the performance of AI systems is a non-trivial task. In this paper, I propose a novel benchmark called super-Nash performance to assess the performance of AI systems in mixed-motive settings. I show that a solution concept called optimin achieves super-Nash performance in every n-person game, i.e., for every Nash equilibrium there exists an optimin where every player not only receives but also guarantees super-Nash payoffs even if the others deviate unilaterally and profitably from the optimin.
翻译:自1990年代以来,AI系统在“结对”定义明确的主要零和游戏中取得了超人性的表现。然而,大多数社会互动是混合运动游戏,衡量AI系统的表现是非三重任务。在本文中,我提议了一个称为超级纳什业绩的新基准,以评估在混合运动环境中AI系统的表现。我表明,一个称为Optimin的解决方案概念在每个n-人游戏中都取得了超纳什业绩,即每个Nash均衡都存在一种选择,即每个参与者不仅得到而且保证超级纳什报酬,即使其他人单方面偏离了Optimin,而且从Poptimin那里获利。