3D semantic segmentation (3DSS) is an essential process in the creation of a safe autonomous driving system. However, deep learning models for 3D semantic segmentation often suffer from the class imbalance problem and out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this study, we explore how the class imbalance problem affects 3DSS performance and whether the model can detect the category prediction correctness, or whether data is ID (in-distribution) or OOD. For these purposes, we conduct two experiments using three representative 3DSS models and five trust scoring methods, and conduct both a confusion and feature analysis of each class. Furthermore, a data augmentation method for the 3D LiDAR dataset is proposed to create a new dataset based on SemanticKITTI and SemanticPOSS, called AugKITTI. We propose the wPre metric and TSD for a more in-depth analysis of the results, and follow are proposals with an insightful discussion. Based on the experimental results, we find that: (1) the classes are not only imbalanced in their data size but also in the basic properties of each semantic category. (2) The intraclass diversity and interclass ambiguity make class learning difficult and greatly limit the models' performance, creating the challenges of semantic and data gaps. (3) The trust scores are unreliable for classes whose features are confused with other classes. For 3DSS models, those misclassified ID classes and OODs may also be given high trust scores, making the 3DSS predictions unreliable, and leading to the challenges in judging 3DSS result trustworthiness. All of these outcomes point to several research directions for improving the performance and reliability of the 3DSS models used for real-world applications.
翻译:3D 语义分解 (3DSSS) 是创建安全自主驱动系统的必要过程。 但是, 3D 语义分解的深学习模式往往会因阶级不平衡问题和分配外数据而受到影响。 在本研究中, 我们探讨阶级不平衡问题如何影响3DSS的性能, 以及该模式是否能够检测类别预测正确性, 或数据是ID( 分布中) 还是OOD。 为此, 我们用三个具有代表性的 3DS 模型和五个信任评分方法进行两次实验, 并对每类进行混乱和特征分析。 此外, 3DAR 数据集的深度学习模式, 3DAR 数据分解的深度数据分解方法, 3DAR 数据分解的数据分解以创建新的数据集。 3DS 类的稳定性分析结果, 用于更深入分析结果, 并随后进行有深刻的讨论。 根据实验结果, 我们发现:(1) 所有类不仅数据大小不平衡, 而且还在每一类的基本特性特性分析。 (2) 这些分解分解的S 级的等级的成绩分级, 使用数据分级和分级数据分级的分解数据分解结果, 的分解为不同的数据分解结果, 。