What Makes a Language Easy to Deep-Learn?

Neural networks drive the success of natural language processing. A fundamental property of language is its compositional structure, allowing humans to produce forms for new meanings systematically. However, unlike humans, neural networks notoriously struggle with systematic generalization, and do not necessarily benefit from compositional structure in emergent communication simulations. This poses a problem for using neural networks to simulate human language learning and evolution, and suggests crucial differences in the biases of the different learning systems. Here, we directly test how neural networks compare to humans in learning and generalizing different input languages that vary in their degree of structure. We evaluate the memorization and generalization capabilities of a pre-trained language model GPT-3.5 (analagous to an adult second language learner) and recurrent neural networks trained from scratch (analaogous to a child first language learner). Our results show striking similarities between deep neural networks and adult human learners, with more structured linguistic input leading to more systematic generalization and to better convergence between neural networks and humans. These findings suggest that all the learning systems are sensitive to the structure of languages in similar ways with compositionality being advantageous for learning. Our findings draw a clear prediction regarding children's learning biases, as well as highlight the challenges of automated processing of languages spoken by small communities. Notably, the similarity between humans and machines opens new avenues for research on language learning and evolution.