Significant enthusiasm around AI uptake has been witnessed across societies globally. The electoral process -- the time, place and manner of elections within democratic nations -- has been among those very rare sectors in which AI has not penetrated much. Electoral management bodies in many countries have recently started exploring and deliberating over the use of AI in the electoral process. In this paper, we consider five representative avenues within the core electoral process which have potential for AI usage, and map the challenges involved in using AI within them. These five avenues are: voter list maintenance, determining polling booth locations, polling booth protection processes, voter authentication and video monitoring of elections. Within each of these avenues, we lay down the context, illustrate current or potential usage of AI, and discuss extant or potential ramifications of AI usage, and potential directions for mitigating risks while considering AI usage. We believe that the scant current usage of AI within electoral processes provides a very rare opportunity, that of being able to deliberate on the risks and mitigation possibilities, prior to real and widespread AI deployment. This paper is an attempt to map the horizons of risks and opportunities in using AI within the electoral processes and to help shape the debate around the topic.
翻译:在全球各个社会,人们目睹了对采用大赦国际的极大热情,选举进程 -- -- 民主国家选举的时间、地点和方式 -- -- 一直是大赦国际没有深入多少的非常罕见的部门之一。许多国家的选举管理机构最近开始探讨和审议在选举进程中使用大赦国际的问题。在本文件中,我们认为核心选举进程中有可能使用大赦国际的五种具有代表性的渠道,并勾画在其中使用大赦国际所涉及的挑战。这五种途径是:选民名单的维护、确定投票站地点、投票亭保护程序、选民认证和选举视频监测。我们在其中每一种途径中,都说明了使用大赦国际的背景、说明目前或可能使用大赦国际的情况,并讨论了使用大赦国际的现存或潜在影响,以及在考虑使用大赦国际的同时减轻风险的潜在方向。我们认为,在选举进程中目前很少使用大赦国际,提供了非常难得的机会,在实际和广泛使用大赦国际之前,能够讨论风险和减轻风险的可能性。本文试图在选举进程中绘制使用大赦国际的风险和机会前景图,并帮助围绕这一主题展开辩论。