A crossover trial is an efficient trial design when there is no carry-over effect. To reduce the impact of the biological carry-over effect, a wash-out period is often designed. However, the carry-over effect remains an outstanding concern when a wash-out period is unethical or cannot sufficiently diminish the impact of the carry-over effect. The latter can occur in comparative effectiveness research where the carry-over effect is often non-biological but behavioral. In this paper, we investigate the crossover design under a potential outcomes framework with and without the carry-over effect. We find that when the carry-over effect exists and satisfies a sign condition, the basic estimator underestimates the treatment effect, which does not inflate the type I error of one-sided tests but negatively impacts the power. This leads to a power trade-off between the crossover design and the parallel-group design, and we derive the condition under which the crossover design does not lead to type I error inflation and is still more powerful than the parallel-group design. We also develop covariate adjustment methods for crossover trials. We illustrate the performance of cross-over design and covariate adjustment using simulations based on resampling data from an HIV prevention trial.
翻译:在没有结转效应的情况下,交叉试验是一种有效的试验设计。为了减少生物结转效应的影响,往往设计了一个冲洗期。然而,当冲洗期不道德或无法充分减少结转效应的影响时,结转效应仍是一个突出的关注问题。后者可以在比较有效性研究中发生,结转效应往往不是生物而是行为性。在本文中,我们根据潜在结果框架调查交叉设计,同时且没有结转效应。我们发现,在结转效应存在并满足标志性条件时,基本估计器低估了治疗效果,而处理效果并没有超越单向测试的第一类错误,而是对权力产生消极影响。这导致交叉设计与平行组设计之间的权力交换,我们从中得出一个条件,即交叉设计不会导致I类误差通胀,而且比平行组设计更强大。我们还发现,当结转效应存在并满足一个标志性条件时,基本估计器低估了治疗效果,而后者并没有超越了单方试验的I类错误,而是对处理效果产生了负面影响。我们用模拟模型来说明在艾滋病毒的交叉设计和组合调整方面的情况。