Context: Although software development is a human activity, Software Engineering (SE) research has focused mostly on processes and tools, making human factors underrepresented. This kind of research may be improved using knowledge from human-focused disciplines. An example of missed opportunities is how SE employs psychometric instruments. Objective: Provide an overview of psychometric instruments in SE research regarding personality and provide recommendations on when adopting them. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping to build a catalog of instruments used within SE for assessing personality and reviewed their use from a multidisciplinary perspective of SE and social science. Results: We contribute with an update of a secondary study covering fifty years of research (1970 to 2020). We observed remaining discrepancies between one of the most adopted instruments (MBTI) and existing recommendations in the literature. We also emphasize that several instruments refer to the Five-Factor Model, and specific advice on how to apply this model within the SE domain is still missing. Conclusion: The findings show that the adoption of psychometric instruments regarding personality in SE needs to be improved, ideally with the support of social sciences researchers. We believe that the review presented in this study can help to understand limitations and evolve in this direction.
翻译:背景:虽然软件开发是一项人类活动,但软件工程(SE)研究主要集中在流程和工具上,而人类因素却不足。这种研究可以通过人类关注学科的知识来改善。 SE采用心理测量工具的一个被忽视的机会的例子。 目标:概述软件工程研究中心理测量工具在人格方面的应用,并提出建议何时采用。 方法:我们进行了系统的映射,以建立SE内用于评估人格的测量工具目录,并从SE和社会科学的多学科视角审查了它们的使用。 结果:我们提供了一项关于50年研究(1970至2020)的辅助研究的更新。我们观察到最常被采用的工具之一(MBTI)与现有文献中的建议之间仍然存在差异。我们还强调了几个测量工具与五要素模型有关,并且在SE领域中如何应用此模型的具体建议仍然缺乏。 结论:发现软件工程中心理测量工具在人格方面的应用需要改善,最好得到社会科学研究人员的支持。 我们认为本研究中所提供的审查可以帮助了解限制并朝着这个方向发展。