Current research on the advantages and trade-offs of using characters, instead of tokenized text, as input for deep learning models, has evolved substantially. New token-free models remove the traditional tokenization step; however, their efficiency remains unclear. Moreover, the effect of tokenization is relatively unexplored in sequence tagging tasks. To this end, we investigate the impact of tokenization when extracting information from documents and present a comparative study and analysis of subword-based and character-based models. Specifically, we study Information Extraction (IE) from biomedical texts. The main outcome is twofold: tokenization patterns can introduce inductive bias that results in state-of-the-art performance, and the character-based models produce promising results; thus, transitioning to token-free IE models is feasible.
翻译:当前有关将字符作为深度学习模型输入的优势和权衡的研究已经得到了很大发展。新的无标记模型移除了传统的标记化步骤,但它们的效率尚不清楚。此外,在序列标记任务中,标记化的影响相对未知。为此,我们调查了从文档中提取信息时标记化的影响,并对基于子词和基于字符的模型进行了比较研究和分析。具体而言,我们研究了从生物医学文本中提取信息。主要结果如下:标记化模式会引入归纳偏差,导致最先进的性能;而基于字符的模型产生了有希望的结果,因此,过渡到无标记化的信息提取模型是可行的。