Many measures of societal bias in language models have been proposed in recent years. A popular approach is to use a set of word filling prompts to evaluate the behavior of the language models. In this work, we analyze the validity of two such measures -- StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs. We show that these measures produce unexpected and illogical results when appropriate control group samples are constructed. Based on this, we believe that they are problematic and using them in the future should be reconsidered. We propose a way forward with an improved testing protocol. Finally, we also introduce a new gender bias dataset for Slovak.
翻译:近年来,提出了语言模式中社会偏见的许多衡量标准。一种流行的做法是使用一套填字提示来评价语言模式的行为。在这项工作中,我们分析了两种此类措施的有效性 -- -- StereoSet和CrowS-Pairs。我们表明,这些措施在建立适当的控制组样本时会产生出乎意料和不合逻辑的结果。在此基础上,我们认为,这些措施存在问题,今后应重新考虑使用这些措施。我们提出了改进测试协议的前进方向。最后,我们还为斯洛伐克人引入了新的性别偏见数据集。</s>