This paper is motivated by the analysis of a survey study of college student wellbeing before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A statistical challenge in well-being survey studies lies in that outcome variables are often recorded in different scales, be it continuous, binary, or ordinal. The presence of mixed data complicates the assessment of the associations between them while adjusting for covariates. In our study, of particular interest are the associations between college students' wellbeing and other mental health measures and how other risk factors moderate these associations during the pandemic. To this end, we propose a unifying framework for studying partial association between mixed data. This is achieved by defining a unified residual using the surrogate method. The idea is to map the residual randomness to the same continuous scale, regardless of the original scales of outcome variables. It applies to virtually all commonly used models for covariate adjustments. We demonstrate the validity of using such defined residuals to assess partial association. In particular, we develop a measure that generalizes classical Kendall's tau in the sense that it can size both partial and marginal associations. More importantly, our development advances the theory of the surrogate method developed in recent years by showing that it can be used without requiring outcome variables having a latent variable structure. The use of our method in the well-being survey analysis reveals (i) significant moderation effects (i.e., the difference between partial and marginal associations) of some key risk factors; and (ii) an elevated moderation effect of physical health, loneliness, and accommodation after the onset of COVID-19.
翻译:暂无翻译