We investigate the performance of concurrent remote sensing from independent strategic sources, whose goal is to minimize a linear combination of the freshness of information and the updating cost. In the literature, this is often investigated from a static perspective of setting the update rate of the sources a priori, either in a centralized optimal way or with a distributed game-theoretic approach. However, we argue that truly rational sources would better make such a decision with full awareness of the current age of information, resulting in a more efficient implementation of the updating policies. To this end, we investigate the scenario where sources independently perform a stateful optimization of their objective. Their strategic character leads to the formalization of this problem as a Markov game, for which we find the resulting Nash equilibrium. This can be translated into practical smooth threshold policies for their update. The results are eventually tested in a sample scenario, comparing a centralized optimal approach with two distributed approaches with different objectives for the players.
翻译:我们从独立战略来源调查并行遥感的性能,其目的是最大限度地减少信息新颖性与更新成本的线性组合;在文献中,往往从静态的角度来调查这一问题,先验地确定源的更新率,或者以集中的最佳方式,或者采用分布式游戏理论方法;然而,我们认为,真正合理的来源最好在充分了解信息当前年龄的情况下作出这样的决定,从而更有效地实施更新政策;为此,我们调查来源独立地对目标进行状态优化的情景;其战略特点导致将这一问题正规化为马科夫游戏,为此我们发现由此产生的纳什平衡;这可以转化为实际的平稳的更新门槛政策;结果最终在抽样假设中进行测试,将集中式最佳方法与两种分布式方法进行比较,对参与者的不同目标进行比较。</s>