The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we present a review of different recording options for gathering prosodic data in the event that fieldwork is impracticable (e.g. due to pandemics). Under this light, we mimic a long-distance reading task experiment using different software and hardware synchronously. In order to evaluate the employed methodologies, we extract noise levels and frequency manipulation of the recordings. Subsequently, we examine the impact of the different recordings onto linguistic variables, such as the pitch curves and values. We also include a discussion on experimental practicalities. After balancing these factors, we decree an online platform, Zencastr, as the most affordable and practical for acoustic data collection. Secondly, we want to open up a debate on the most optimal remote methodology that researchers on speech prosody can deploy.
翻译:本文的目的是双重的。 首先,我们回顾在现场工作不可行(例如,由于流行病)的情况下收集初步数据的不同记录选项。在这个光线下,我们模拟了使用不同软件和硬件的远程阅读实验。为了评估所使用的方法,我们提取噪音水平和录音的频率操控。随后,我们研究不同录音对语言变量的影响,例如投放曲线和价值。我们还包括关于实验实用性的讨论。在权衡这些因素之后,我们下令建立一个在线平台Zencastr,作为收集声学数据最负担得起和最实用的平台。第二,我们想就语言演练研究人员能够采用的最优化远程方法展开一场辩论。