Multispectral imaging is an important technique for improving the readability of written or printed text where the letters have faded, either due to deliberate erasing or simply due to the ravages of time. Often the text can be read simply by looking at individual wavelengths, but in some cases the images need further enhancement to maximise the chances of reading the text. There are many possible enhancement techniques and this paper assesses and compares an extended set of dimensionality reduction methods for image processing. We assess 15 dimensionality reduction methods in two different manuscripts. This assessment was performed both subjectively by asking the opinions of scholars who were experts in the languages used in the manuscripts which of the techniques they preferred and also by using the Davies-Bouldin and Dunn indexes for assessing the quality of the resulted image clusters. We found that the Canonical Variates Analysis (CVA) method which was using a Matlab implementation and we have used previously to enhance multispectral images, it was indeed superior to all the other tested methods. However it is very likely that other approaches will be more suitable in specific circumstance so we would still recommend that a range of these techniques are tried. In particular, CVA is a supervised clustering technique so it requires considerably more user time and effort than a non-supervised technique such as the much more commonly used Principle Component Analysis Approach (PCA). If the results from PCA are adequate to allow a text to be read then the added effort required for CVA may not be justified. For the purposes of comparing the computational times and the image results, a CVA method is also implemented in C programming language and using the GNU (GNUs Not Unix) Scientific Library (GSL) and the OpenCV (OPEN source Computer Vision) computer vision programming library.
翻译:多光谱成像是提高书面或印刷文字的可读性的重要技术,因为字母已经淡化,或者是因为有意删除,或者只是时间的破坏。文本通常可以通过查看单个波长来阅读,但在某些情况下,图像需要进一步加强,以最大限度地增加阅读文本的机会。有许多可能的增强技术,本文评估并比较了一套扩大的图像处理减少维度的方法。我们用两种不同的手稿评估了15维度降低方法。这种评估既主观地进行,既征求了手稿中所用语言的专家的意见,也纯粹由于时间的破坏。 通常,通过Davies-Bouldin和Dun指数来评估单个波长,但在某些情况下,图像需要进一步改进阅读。 我们发现,Conononic Varical Variate 分析(C)方法确实优于所有其他经过测试的方法。然而,其他方法很可能更适合特定的情况,因此,我们还是建议,对于C类的手稿使用哪些语言的专家,我们还是建议,对C级图像进行一种比较,而C级的计算方法则需要更深入地使用。