Recommender systems are used to provide relevant suggestions on various matters. Although these systems are a classical research topic, knowledge is still limited regarding the public opinion about these systems. Public opinion is also important because the systems are known to cause various problems. To this end, this paper presents a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of ordinary citizens, civil society groups, businesses, and others on recommender systems in Europe. The dataset examined is based on the answers submitted to a consultation about the Digital Services Act (DSA) recently enacted in the European Union (EU). Therefore, not only does the paper contribute to the pressing question about regulating new technologies and online platforms, but it also reveals insights about the policy-making of the DSA. According to the qualitative results, Europeans have generally negative opinions about recommender systems and the quality of their recommendations. The systems are widely seen to violate privacy and other fundamental rights. According to many Europeans, these also cause various societal problems, including even threats to democracy. Furthermore, existing regulations in the EU are commonly seen to have failed due to a lack of proper enforcement. Numerous suggestions were made by the respondents to the consultation for improving the situation, but only a few of these ended up to the DSA.
翻译:虽然这些系统是一个古典的研究课题,但对这些系统的公共舆论的了解仍然有限; 公众舆论也很重要,因为人们知道这些系统会造成各种问题; 为此,本文件对欧洲普通公民、民间社会团体、企业和其他人士对建议系统的看法进行了定性分析; 所审查的数据集是以欧洲联盟(欧盟)最近颁布的《数字服务法》(DSA)磋商提交的答复为依据的。 因此,该文件不仅有助于解决关于管理新技术和在线平台的紧迫问题,而且还揭示了对DSA决策的洞察力。 根据质量结果,欧洲人对建议系统及其建议的质量普遍持负面看法。人们普遍认为,这些系统侵犯了隐私和其他基本权利。许多欧洲人认为,这也造成了各种社会问题,包括对民主的威胁。此外,人们普遍认为,欧盟现行规章没有得到适当执行,因此没有成功。 磋商的答卷者提出了许多关于改善情况的建议,但只有少数建议最终导致DSA。