While individual-level AI-assisted analysis has been fairly examined in prior work, AI-assisted collaborative qualitative analysis (CQA) remains an under-explored area of research. After identifying CQA behaviors and design opportunities through interviews, we propose our collaborative qualitative coding tool, CoAIcoder, and present the results of our studies that examine how AI-assisted CQA can work. We then designed a between-subject experiment with 32 pairs of novice users to perform CQA across three commonly practiced phases under four collaboration methods. Our results show that CoAIcoder (with AI & Shared Model) could potentially improve the coding efficiency of CQA, however, with a potential risk of decreasing the code diversity. We also highlight the relationship between independence level and coding outcome, as well as the trade-off between, on the one hand, Coding Time & IRR, and on the other hand Code Diversity. We lastly identified design implications to inspire the future design of CQA systems.
翻译:尽管先前的工作已经相当研究了个人层面的AI辅助分析,但AI辅助的协作性质性分析(CQA)仍然是一个未被充分探索的研究领域。通过采访人们并识别CQA行为和设计机会,我们提出了我们的协作性质性编码工具CoAIcoder,并呈现了我们的研究结果,考察了AI辅助CQA如何工作。随后我们设计了一个对32对新手用户进行的实验,对常见的三个实践阶段在四个协作方法下进行CQA。我们的结果显示,CoAIcoder(使用AI和共享模型)有可能提高CQA的编码效率,然而,有可能会降低编码多样性的风险。我们也强调了独立水平与编码结果的关系,以及编码时间和IRR一方面与编码多样性另一方面之间的平衡。最后,我们确定了设计方面的含义,以启发未来CQA系统的设计。