Introduction. The stress response has both subjective, psychological and objectively measurable, biological components. Both of them can be expressed differently from person to person, complicating the development of a generic stress measurement model. This is further compounded by the lack of large, labeled datasets that can be utilized to build machine learning models for accurately detecting periods and levels of stress. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current state of stress detection and monitoring using wearable devices, and where applicable, machine learning techniques utilized. Methods. This study reviewed published works contributing and/or using datasets designed for detecting stress and their associated machine learning methods, with a systematic review and meta-analysis of those that utilized wearable sensor data as stress biomarkers. The electronic databases of Google Scholar, Crossref, DOAJ and PubMed were searched for relevant articles and a total of 24 articles were identified and included in the final analysis. The reviewed works were synthesized into three categories of publicly available stress datasets, machine learning, and future research directions. Results. A wide variety of study-specific test and measurement protocols were noted in the literature. A number of public datasets were identified that are labeled for stress detection. In addition, we discuss that previous works show shortcomings in areas such as their labeling protocols, lack of statistical power, validity of stress biomarkers, and generalization ability. Conclusion. Generalization of existing machine learning models still require further study, and research in this area will continue to provide improvements as newer and more substantial datasets become available for study.
翻译:压力反应既有主观的、心理的,也有客观的、可测量的、生物的成分。两者都可因人而异,使一般压力计量模型的开发工作复杂化。由于缺乏大量贴有标签的数据集,无法用来建立机器学习模型,以准确检测压力期和压力程度。审查的目的是概述使用可磨损装置和酌情使用机器学习技术进行的压力检测和监测的现状。方法:这项研究审查了出版的作品,这些作品有助于和(或)使用为检测压力而设计的数据集及其相关的机器学习方法,系统审查和元化分析那些使用可磨损传感器数据作为压力生物标志的数据集。谷歌学者、克罗斯雷夫、DOAJ和普布迈德的电子数据库被搜索了相关文章,共24篇文章被确定并列入最后分析。审查的作品被综合成三种公开提供的压力数据集、机器学习以及未来研究方向。研究结果:在文献中,大量研究具体的测试和测量程序,我们发现在以往的统计研究领域,更多的现有数据测量能力领域将显示我们现有的数据压力。</s>