Practitioners successfully use hidden Markov chains (HMCs) in different problems for about sixty years. HMCs belong to the family of generative models and they are often compared to discriminative models, like conditional random fields (CRFs). Authors usually consider CRFs as quite different from HMCs, and CRFs are often presented as interesting alternative to HMCs. In some areas, like natural language processing (NLP), discriminative models have completely supplanted generative models. However, some recent results show that both families of models are not so different, and both of them can lead to identical processing power. In this paper we compare the simple linear-chain CRFs to the basic HMCs. We show that HMCs are identical to CRFs in that for each CRF we explicitly construct an HMC having the same posterior distribution. Therefore, HMCs and linear-chain CRFs are not different but just differently parametrized models.
翻译:执业者在大约60年的时间里成功地在不同问题中使用了隐蔽的Markov链条(HMCs) 。HMCs属于基因模型的家族,它们往往与歧视性模型相比,如有条件随机字段(CRFs ) 。作者通常认为通用报告格式与HMCs有很大不同,通用报告格式往往被作为HMCs有趣的替代方法提出。在有些领域,如自然语言处理(NLP),歧视性模型完全取代了基因模型。然而,最近的一些结果显示,两种模型的家族并不那么不同,它们都可能导致相同的处理能力。在本文中,我们比较简单的线性链式通用报告格式与基本HMCs 。我们表明,HMCs与每套通用报告格式的通用报告格式相同,我们明确为HMCs制造的外表分布相同。因此,HMCs和线性链式通用报告格式并不不同,但只是不同。