In this note we disprove a conjecture of Kuzmin and Warmuth claiming that every family whose VC-dimension is at most d admits an unlabeled compression scheme to a sample of size at most d. We also study the unlabeled compression schemes of the joins of some families and conjecture that these give a larger gap between the VC-dimension and the size of the smallest unlabeled compression scheme for them.
翻译:在本说明中,我们反驳了Kuzmin和Warmuth的猜想,声称每个家庭,其VC-dimension最多最多是d 承认一个未贴标签的压缩计划,在最多是d 的大小抽样中采样。 我们还研究一些家庭的未贴标签的压缩计划,并推测这给VC-discion与最小的未贴标签压缩计划之间的差别更大。