Past research on pedestrian trajectory forecasting mainly focused on deterministic predictions which provide only point estimates of future states. These future estimates can help an autonomous vehicle plan its trajectory and avoid collision. However, under dynamic traffic scenarios, planning based on deterministic predictions is not trustworthy. Rather, estimating the uncertainty associated with the predicted states with a certain level of confidence can lead to robust path planning. Hence, the authors propose to quantify this uncertainty during forecasting using stochastic approximation which deterministic approaches fail to capture. The current method is simple and applies Bayesian approximation during inference to standard neural network architectures for estimating uncertainty. The authors compared the predictions between the probabilistic neural network (NN) models with the standard deterministic models. The results indicate that the mean predicted path of probabilistic models was closer to the ground truth when compared with the deterministic prediction. Further, the effect of stochastic dropout of weights and long-term prediction on future state uncertainty has been studied. It was found that the probabilistic models produced better performance metrics like average displacement error (ADE) and final displacement error (FDE). Finally, the study has been extended to multiple datasets providing a comprehensive comparison for each model.
翻译:以往关于行人轨迹预测的研究主要侧重于仅提供未来状态点估计的确定性预测。这些未来估计有助于自主车辆规划其轨迹和避免碰撞。然而,在动态交通假设下,基于确定性预测的规划并不可信。相反,以某种程度的信心估计预测状态的不确定性,可导致稳健的路径规划。因此,作者提议在使用确定性方法无法捕捉的随机近似值进行预测时量化这一不确定性。目前的方法很简单,在推断标准神经网络结构以估计不确定性时,采用巴伊西亚近似法。作者比较了概率性神经网络模型与标准确定性模型之间的预测。结果显示,与确定性预测性预测相比,预测性模型的平均预测路径更接近于地面真理。此外,还研究了超强性减重和长期预测对未来状态不确定性的影响。发现,预测性模型产生更好的性能指标,如平均流离失所错误(ADE)和最终流离失所错误(FDEE)等。最后,研究将每一项数据扩展为多重比较。