An enhanced label propagation (LP) method called GraphHop was proposed recently. It outperforms graph convolutional networks (GCNs) in the semi-supervised node classification task on various networks. Although the performance of GraphHop was explained intuitively with joint node attribute and label signal smoothening, its rigorous mathematical treatment is lacking. In this paper, we propose a label efficient regularization and propagation (LERP) framework for graph node classification, and present an alternate optimization procedure for its solution. Furthermore, we show that GraphHop only offers an approximate solution to this framework and has two drawbacks. First, it includes all nodes in the classifier training without taking the reliability of pseudo-labeled nodes into account in the label update step. Second, it provides a rough approximation to the optimum of a subproblem in the label aggregation step. Based on the LERP framework, we propose a new method, named the LERP method, to solve these two shortcomings. LERP determines reliable pseudo-labels adaptively during the alternate optimization and provides a better approximation to the optimum with computational efficiency. Theoretical convergence of LERP is guaranteed. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of LERP. That is, LERP outperforms all benchmarking methods, including GraphHop, consistently on five test datasets and an object recognition task at extremely low label rates (i.e., 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 20 labeled samples per class).
翻译:最近提出了称为GreaphHop的强化标签传播方法(LP),它比半监督节点分类任务中的半监督节点图图变动网络(GCNs)强。虽然GreaphHop的性能通过联合节点属性和标签标志信号的平稳化被直截了当地解释,但缺乏严格的数学处理方法。在本文中,我们提议了一个名为图形节点分类的标签高效正规化和传播框架(LERP)框架,并提出了解决这两个缺陷的替代优化程序。此外,我们显示GreaphHop只为这一框架提供了近似的解决办法,并有两个缺点。首先,它包括了分类培训中的所有节点,而没有在标签更新步骤中考虑到假标签节点的可靠性。第二,它提供了一个粗略的近似度,以优化标签组合步骤中的子节点。根据LERP框架,我们提出了一个新的方法,称为LERP方法,以解决这两个缺点。LERP在替代优化期间确定可靠的假标签,并且为每个目标的最佳目标提供了两个缺点。第一,在计算效率方面,对LERERP标准的所有测试率和最接近率都保证了LERP标准的测试方法。