The fragility index is a clinically motivated metric designed to supplement the $p$ value during hypothesis testing. The measure relies on two pillars: selecting cases to have their outcome modified and modifying the outcomes. The measure is interesting but the case selection suffers from a drawback which can hamper its interpretation. This work presents the drawback and a method, the stochastic generalized fragility indices, designed to remedy it. Two examples concerning electoral outcomes and the causal effect of smoking cessation illustrate the method.
翻译:脆弱性指数是一种临床驱动的衡量标准,旨在补充假设测试期间的美元价值,该措施依靠两个支柱:选择案件修改结果和修改结果。该措施很有意思,但选择案件存在缺陷,可能妨碍其解释。这项工作提出了缺陷和一种方法,即旨在纠正缺陷的普遍脆弱性指数。两个关于选举结果和戒烟因果的例子说明了方法。