The aim of this article is to make a contribution to the Bayesian procedure of testing precise hypotheses for parametric models. For this purpose, we define the Bayesian Discrepancy Measure that allows one to evaluate the suitability of a given hypothesis with respect to the available information (prior law and data). To summarise this information, the posterior median is employed, allowing a simple assessment of the discrepancy with a fixed hypothesis. The Bayesian Discrepancy Measure assesses the compatibility of a single hypothesis with the observed data, as opposed to the more common comparative approach where a hypothesis is rejected in favour of a competing hypothesis. The proposed measure of evidence has properties of consistency and invariance. After presenting the definition of the measure for a parameter of interest, both in the absence and in the presence of nuisance parameters, we illustrate some examples showing its conceptual and interpretative simplicity. Finally, we compare the BDT with the Full Bayesian Significance Test, a well-known Bayesian testing procedure for sharp hypotheses.
翻译:本条的目的是为贝叶斯测试参数模型精确假设的程序作出贡献。为此目的,我们界定了贝叶斯差异性措施,以便能够评估某一假设对现有信息(原始法律和数据)是否合适。概括这一信息,采用后置中位值,可以简单评估与固定假设的差异。贝叶斯差异性措施评估单一假设与观察到的数据的兼容性,而不是比较方法的更常见方法,即一个假设被否定而倾向于相竞假设。拟议的证据衡量方法具有一致性和不变性。在对某一利益参数的计量进行定义之后,无论在不存在或存在麻烦参数的情况下,我们举例说明其概念和解释的简单性。最后,我们将BDT与全巴伊斯迹象测试进行比较,这是众所周知的对尖锐假设的巴伊斯测试程序。