We discuss difficulties of evaluating partisan gerrymandering in the congressional districts in Utah and the failure of many common metrics in Utah. We explain why the Republican vote share in the least-Republican district (LRVS) is a good indicator of the advantage or disadvantage each party has in the Utah congressional districts. Although the LRVS only makes sense in settings with at most one competitive district, in that setting it directly captures the extent to which a given redistricting plan gives advantage or disadvantage to the Republican and Democratic parties. We use the LRVS to evaluate the most common measures of partisan gerrymandering in the context of Utah's 2011 congressional districts. We do this by generating large ensembles of alternative redistricting plans using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We also discuss the implications of this new metric and our results on the question of whether the 2011 Utah congressional plan was gerrymandered.
翻译:我们讨论在犹他州国会各区评估党派利益分歧的困难以及犹他州许多通用指标的失败。我们解释为何共和党在最不共和州区(LRVS)的选票份额是每个政党在犹他州议会各区的优势或劣势的良好指标。虽然LRVS只在多数竞争区的环境中才有意义,因为在设定时直接抓住了某一重新划分计划给共和党和民主党带来优势或劣势的程度。我们利用LRVS来评估2011年犹他州国会各区最常见的党派利益划分措施。我们这样做的方法是利用Markov连锁的蒙特卡洛方法,产生大量备选重新划分地区计划。我们还讨论了这一新指标的影响以及我们关于2011年乌他州国会计划是否被拉近的问题的结果。