In a single-parameter mechanism design problem, a provider is looking to sell a service to a group of potential buyers. Each buyer $i$ has a private value $v_i$ for receiving the service and a feasibility constraint restricts which sets of buyers can be served simultaneously. Recent work in economics introduced clock auctions as a superior class of auctions for this problem, due to their transparency, simplicity, and strong incentive guarantees. Subsequent work focused on evaluating the social welfare approximation guarantees of these auctions, leading to strong impossibility results: in the absence of prior information regarding the buyers' values, no deterministic clock auction can achieve a bounded approximation, even for simple feasibility constraints with only two maximal feasible sets. We show that these negative results can be circumvented by using prior information or by leveraging randomization. We provide clock auctions that give a $O(\log\log k)$ approximation for general downward-closed feasibility constraints with $k$ maximal feasible sets for three different information models, ranging from full access to the value distributions to complete absence of information. The more information the seller has, the simpler these auctions are. Under full access, we use a particularly simple deterministic clock auction, called a single-price clock auction, which is only slightly more complex than posted price mechanisms. In this auction, each buyer is offered a single price and a feasible set is selected among those who accept their offers. In the other extreme, where no prior information is available, this approximation guarantee is obtained using a complex randomized clock auction. In addition to our main results, we propose a parameterization that interpolates between single-price clock auctions and general clock auctions, paving the way for an exciting line of future research.
翻译:在一个单一参数机制设计问题中, 供应商正在寻找向一组潜在买主出售一项服务。 每个买主的美元都有一个私人价值 $v_ i 美元, 用于接受服务, 并且存在一个可行性限制, 从而限制买主可以同时服务。 最近经济学中的工作引入了时钟拍卖,作为这一问题的高级拍卖类别, 原因是其透明度、 简洁和强有力的奖励保证。 随后的工作侧重于评估这些拍卖的社会福利近似保证, 从而导致巨大的不可能结果: 在缺乏关于买主价值的事先信息的情况下, 没有一个定时钟拍卖可以达到一个约束性的近似, 即使是简单的可行性限制, 只有两种最可行的套套套套套套套套套套。 我们提供时钟拍卖的时钟, 一种简单易用的时钟, 一种简单易变价拍卖的行价, 一种简单易变价的行价, 一种固定的行价, 一种固定的行价, 一种是固定的行价, 固定的行价。