Communication within groups of agents has been lately the focus of research in dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). This paper studies a recently introduced form of partial (more precisely, topic-based) communication. This type of communication allows for modelling scenarios of multi-agent collaboration and negotiation, and it is particularly well-suited for situations in which sharing all information is not feasible/advisable. After presenting results on invariance and complexity of model checking, the paper compares partial communication to public announcements, probably the most well-known type of communication in DEL. It is shown that the settings are, update-wise, incomparable: there are scenarios in which the effect of a public announcement cannot be replicated by partial communication, and vice versa. Then, the paper shifts its attention to strategic topic-based communication. It does so by extending the language with a modality that quantifies over the topics the agents can `talk about'. For this new framework, it provides a complete axiomatisation, showing also that the new language's model checking problem is PSPACE-complete. The paper closes showing that, in terms of expressivity, this new language of arbitrary partial communication is incomparable to that of arbitrary public announcements.
翻译:最近,各代理机构之间的交流一直是动态缩略语逻辑(DEL)研究的重点。本文研究的是最近采用的一种部分(更确切地说,基于专题)交流的形式。这种交流可以模拟多代理人合作和谈判的假想,而且特别适合于所有信息共享不可行/不可行/不可行的情况。在介绍了关于差异和复杂模式检查的结果之后,本文将部分交流与公开公告(可能是DEL中最著名的通信类型)作了比较。文件表明,各种设置是更新的,无法比较的:有些情况是,公开公告的效果无法通过部分沟通复制,反之亦然。随后,文件将其注意力转向基于战略主题的沟通。它这样做的方式是扩大语言,对代理人能够`谈论'的主题进行量化。对于这一新的框架,它提供了完整的非典型化,也表明新语言的示范核对问题是PACACE的完整。文件最后表明,从明确意义上讲,这种任意的新的语言是任意的。