Ranking intuitionistic fuzzy sets with distance based ranking methods requires to calculate the distance between intuitionistic fuzzy set and a reference point which is known to have either maximum (positive ideal solution) or minimum (negative ideal solution) value. These group of approaches assume that as the distance of an intuitionistic fuzzy set to the reference point is decreases, the similarity of intuitionistic fuzzy set with that point increases. This is a misconception because an intuitionistic fuzzy set which has the shortest distance to positive ideal solution does not have to be the furthest from negative ideal solution for all circumstances when the distance function is nonlinear. This paper gives a mathematical proof of why this assumption is not valid for any of the non-linear distance functions and suggests a hypervolume based ranking approach as an alternative to distance based ranking. In addition, the suggested ranking approach is extended as a new multicriteria decision making method, HyperVolume based ASsessment (HVAS). HVAS is applied for multicriteria assessment of Turkey's energy alternatives. Results are compared with three well known distance based multicriteria decision making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR, and CODAS).
翻译:将直觉模糊的集合排列为基于距离的排序方法,要求计算直觉模糊的集合和已知具有最大(积极理想解决办法)或最低(消极理想解决办法)值的参考点之间的距离。这些方法组假定,当直觉模糊的集合与参照点的距离下降,直觉模糊的集合与该点增加的相似性。这是一种误解,因为直觉模糊的集合与积极理想解决办法的距离最短,对于远程函数非线性的所有情况,直觉模糊的集合和已知具有最大(积极理想解决办法)或最小(消极理想解决办法)值的参照点之间的距离并不最远。本文从数学上证明这一假设对任何非线性距离函数无效的原因,并提出一种超容量排序方法,作为基于距离的排序的替代方法。此外,所建议的排序方法作为新的多标准决策方法(基于ASsyVolume ASessment (HVASS) ) 扩展为扩展。HVASS用于土耳其能源替代品的多标准评估。结果与三种已知的远程多标准决策方法(TOPIS、VIKOR、CS)比较。