Software development projects management is a complex endeavor because it requires dealing with numerous unforeseen events that constantly arise along the way and that go against the expectations that had been established at the beginning. A good project leader is not so much who carries out what is planned, but rather who is able to deal with all the inconveniences that arise and, in the end, achieve a result that is as close as possible to what was expected [1]. In other words, what is most valued is the ability to adapt to changes, to face unforeseen events, to make the best decisions regarding a reality that is imposed as the project progresses. On the other hand, those of us who dedicate ourselves to IT projects have the tendency to cling to the tools that gave us the best results, although many times they are not the most appropriate for the case or, if they are, we continue to maintain them even when the context of the project has changed. We are interested in portraying the state of the art of software development project management with respect to the selection of management strategies based on the complexity of the problem to be faced. Our goal is to collect all the available evidence, analyze it, and study the possibility of guiding in the selection of most appropriate approaches, techniques, and tools, depending on the complexity of the problem, to better manage projects. In this document we detail the planning phase of a Systematic Mapping Study, used to structure the findings on a research area, based on the guidelines from Petersen et al. Our goal is twofold: to identify the evidence present in the scientific literature about criteria to select agile or plan-based project management approaches, techniques and tools, and the frameworks used to characterize the projects, in case they are used. We will perform a systematic mapping study of the literature for this purpose.
翻译：软件开发项目管理是一项复杂的工作,因为它需要处理在路上不断发生的许多意外事件,而这种事件与开始时所建立的期望不符。好的项目领导者并不是什么好的项目领导者,而是那些能够执行计划所规划的那些事情的人,而是谁能够处理所有产生的不便,最终取得尽可能接近预期的结果[1]。换句话说,最宝贵的是适应变化的能力,面对意外事件,就项目进展过程中强加的现实作出最佳决定。另一方面,我们致力于信息技术项目的人倾向于坚持那些给我们带来最佳结果的工具,尽管在许多情况下,他们不是最适合处理所出现的不便,而且最终能够取得一个尽可能接近预期的结果。换句话说,我们最珍视的是适应变化的能力,适应变化,面对意外事件,能够作出最佳决定,对一个现实作出最佳决定。 另一方面,我们致力于信息技术项目的文献,从所有现有证据,分析它,研究在规划阶段里给我们带来最佳结果的工具,如果它们不是最合适的工具,我们继续维持这些结果。我们有兴趣描述软件开发项目管理的艺术状况,根据问题的复杂性选择管理战略。我们的目标是收集所有现有证据,分析它,从基础上研究,研究在最精确地分析,在使用的方法中, 选择一个更精确的系统化的研究工具中,我们所使用的方法,我们所使用的方法,在使用的方法中,在选择一个更精确的研究中,我们所使用的方法上,我们所使用的方法。我们使用的方法在使用的方法和精确的方面,我们所使用的一个选择一个选择一个选择一个方法。在使用的方法。在使用的方法。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员