We revisit the divide-and-conquer sequential Monte Carlo (DaC-SMC) algorithm and firmly establish it as a well-founded method by showing that it possesses the same basic properties as conventional sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithms do. In particular, we derive pertinent laws of large numbers, $L^p$ inequalities, and central limit theorems; and we characterize the bias in the normalized estimates produced by the algorithm and argue the absence thereof in the unnormalized ones. We further consider its practical implementation and several interesting variants; obtain expressions for its globally and locally optimal intermediate targets, auxiliary measures, and proposal kernels; and show that, in comparable conditions, DaC-SMC proves more statistically efficient than its direct SMC analogue. We close the paper with a discussion of our results, open questions, and future research directions.
翻译:我们重新审视了分而治之相继的蒙特卡洛(DaC-SMC)算法(DaC-SMC),并通过表明它拥有与传统的后继蒙特卡洛(SMC)算法相同的基本特性,将它牢固地确立为一种有充分依据的方法。特别是,我们产生了大量相关的法律、美元不平等和核心限制理论;我们描述了算法产生的标准化估计中的偏差,并争论在未规范的算法中不存在这种偏差。我们进一步考虑其实际实施和若干有趣的变式;获得其全球和地方最佳中间目标、辅助措施和提议核心的表达方式;并表明,在类似条件下,DaC-SMC在统计上比其直接的SMC类比更有效率。我们结束论文时讨论了我们的结果、开放的问题和未来的研究方向。