Recommender systems can strongly influence which information we see online, e.g., on social media, and thus impact our beliefs, decisions, and actions. At the same time, these systems can create substantial business value for different stakeholders. Given the growing potential impact of such AI-based systems on individuals, organizations, and society, questions of fairness have gained increased attention in recent years. However, research on fairness in recommender systems is still a developing area. In this survey, we first review the fundamental concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. Afterward, through a review of more than 150 scholarly publications, we present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized, e.g., in terms of general research methodology, fairness measures, and algorithmic approaches. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to specific research gaps. In particular, we find that in many research works in computer science, very abstract problem operationalizations are prevalent, and questions of the underlying normative claims and what represents a fair recommendation in the context of a given application are often not discussed in depth. These observations call for more interdisciplinary research to address fairness in recommendation in a more comprehensive and impactful manner.
翻译:咨询系统可以有力地影响我们在网上看到的信息,例如社交媒体信息,从而影响我们的信仰、决定和行动。同时,这些系统可以为不同的利益攸关方创造巨大的商业价值。鉴于这种基于AI的系统对个人、组织和社会的潜在影响越来越大,近年来公平问题日益受到重视。然而,关于建议系统公正性的研究仍然是一个发展中的领域。在这次调查中,我们首先审查最近在该领域提出的基本概念和公平概念。随后,通过审查150多份学术出版物,我们概述了这一领域研究目前是如何运作的,例如在一般研究方法、公平措施和算法方法方面。总体而言,我们对最近工作的分析指出了具体的研究差距。特别是,我们发现,在许多计算机科学研究工作中,非常抽象的操作问题十分普遍,基本规范要求的问题和在特定应用中代表公平建议的内容往往没有得到深入讨论。这些观察要求进行更深入的研究,以更全面和更全面的方式处理建议公平问题。