We develop the analysis (cosparse) variant of the popular audio declipping algorithm of Siedenburg et al. (2014). Furthermore, we extend both the old and the new variants by the possibility of weighting the time-frequency coefficients. We examine the audio reconstruction performance of several combinations of weights and shrinkage operators. The weights are shown to improve the reconstruction quality in some cases; however, the best scores achieved by the non-weighted methods are not surpassed with the help of weights. Yet, the analysis Empirical Wiener (EW) shrinkage was able to reach the quality of a computationally more expensive competitor, the Persistent Empirical Wiener (PEW). Moreover, the proposed analysis variant incorporating PEW slightly outperforms the synthesis counterpart in terms of an auditorily motivated metric.
翻译:我们开发了Siedenburg等人(2014年)流行的音频解密算法的分析(粗略)变方。此外,我们通过对时间-频率系数加权的可能性扩大了旧变方和新变方。我们审视了几组重量和缩水操作员组合的音频重建性能。加权表明在某些情况下提高了重建质量;然而,非加权方法所取得的最佳分数在重量的帮助下并未超过。然而,“经验-威纳(EW)”缩水分析能够达到计算成本更高的竞争者(PEW)的质量。此外,拟议的分析变方(PEW)将PEW(PEW)纳入的合成方略优于有说服力的指数。