This paper analyzes the fundamental limit of the strategic semantic communication problem in which a transmitter obtains a limited number of indirect observation of an intrinsic semantic information source and can then influence the receiver's decoding by sending a limited number of messages to an imperfect channel. The transmitter and the receiver can have different distortion measures and can make rational decision about their encoding and decoding strategies, respectively. The decoder can also have some side information (e.g., background knowledge and/or information obtained from previous communications) about the semantic source to assist its interpretation of the semantic information. We focus particularly on the case that the transmitter can commit to an encoding strategy and study the impact of the strategic decision making on the rate distortion of semantic communication. Three equilibrium solutions including the strong Stackelberg equilibrium, weak Stackelberg equilibrium, as well as Nash equilibrium have been studied and compared. The optimal encoding and decoding strategy profiles under various equilibrium solutions have been derived. We prove that committing to an encoding strategy cannot always bring benefit to the encoder. We therefore propose a feasible condition under which committing to an encoding strategy can always reduce the distortion performance of semantic communication.
翻译:本文分析了战略语义通信问题的根本限制,在这种范围内,发报机获得对内在语义信息来源的有限间接观测,然后通过向不完善的频道发送数量有限的信息影响接收器的解码。发报机和接收机可以分别采取不同的扭曲措施,并能够对其编码和解码战略做出合理的决定。解码器还可以获得一些关于语义来源的侧面信息(例如背景知识和/或从以往通信中获得的信息),以帮助解释语义信息。我们特别侧重于发报机可以承诺采用编码战略并研究战略决策对语言通信速度扭曲的影响。三种平衡解决方案,包括强大的斯塔克尔堡平衡、弱的斯塔克尔堡平衡以及纳什平衡,已经研究和比较。根据各种平衡解决方案,已经得出了最佳的编码和解码战略简介。我们证明,承诺采用编码战略不会总是使编码器受益。我们因此提出了一个可行的条件,即承诺采用编码战略可以减少语义通信的扭曲性。