The lack of established rules and regulations in cyberspace is attributed to the absence of agreed-upon ethical principles, making it difficult to establish accountability, regulations, and laws. Addressing this challenge requires examining cyberspace from fundamental philosophical principles. This work focuses on the ethics of using defensive deception in cyberspace, proposing a doctrine of cyber effect that incorporates five ethical principles: goodwill, deontology, no-harm, transparency, and fairness. To guide the design of defensive cyber deception, we develop a reasoning framework, the game of ethical duplicity, which is consistent with the doctrine. While originally intended for cyber deception, this doctrine has broader applicability, including for ethical issues such as AI accountability and controversies related to YouTube recommendations. By establishing ethical principles, we can promote greater accountability, regulation, and protection in the digital realm.
翻译:网络空间缺乏既定规则和条例的原因是缺乏商定的道德原则,因此难以建立问责制、条例和法律。应对这一挑战需要从基本哲学原则中审视网络空间。这项工作侧重于在网络空间使用防御性欺骗的伦理问题,提出了网络效应学说,其中包括五项道德原则:善意、道德、无害、透明和公平。为了指导防御性网络欺骗的设计,我们制定了一个推理框架,即道德双性游戏,这与理论一致。虽然最初是为了网络欺骗,但这一理论具有更广泛的适用性,包括在诸如AI问责制和与YouTube建议有关的争议等伦理问题上。通过确立道德原则,我们可以在数字领域促进更大的问责制、监管和保护。</s>