Recently, there has been great interest in estimating the conditional average treatment effect using flexible machine learning methods. However, in practice, investigators often have working hypotheses about effect heterogeneity across pre-defined subgroups of individuals, which we call the groupwise approach. The paper compares two modern ways to estimate groupwise treatment effects, a nonparametric approach and a semiparametric approach, with the goal of better informing practice. Specifically, we compare (a) the underlying assumptions, (b) efficiency and adaption to the underlying data generating models, and (c) a way to combine the two approaches. We also discuss how to test a key assumption concerning the semiparametric estimator and to obtain cluster-robust standard errors if individuals in the same subgroups are not independent and identically distributed. We conclude by reanalyzing the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.
翻译:最近,人们对使用灵活的机器学习方法来估计有条件平均治疗效果很感兴趣,但在实践中,调查人员往往对预先界定的个人分组之间的效果差异有工作假设,我们称之为群体方法,该文件比较了两种现代方法来估计群体治疗效果,一种非对称方法和半对称方法,目的是更好地说明做法,具体地说,我们比较了(a) 基本假设,(b) 效率和适应基本数据生成模型,(c) 两种方法相结合的方法。我们还讨论如何测试关于半对称估量器的关键假设,如果同一分组的个人不独立和分布相同,我们通过重新分析早期儿童纵向研究得出结论。</s>