Kleene's computability theory based on his S1-S9 computation schemes constitutes a model for computing with objects of any finite type and extends Turing's `machine model' which formalises computing with real numbers. A fundamental distinction in Kleene's framework is between normal and non-normal functionals where the former compute the associated Kleene quantifier $\exists^{n}$ and the latter do not. Historically, the focus was on normal functionals, but recently new non-normal functionals have been studied, based on well-known theorems like the uncountability of the reals. These new non-normal functionals are fundamentally different from historical examples like Tait's fan functional: the latter is computable from $\exists^{2}$ while the former are only computable in $\exists^{3}$. While there is a great divide separating $\exists^{2}$ and $\exists^{3}$, we identify certain closely related non-normal functionals that fall on different sides of this abyss. Our examples are based on mainstream mathematical notions, like quasi-continuity, Baire classes, and semi-continuity.
翻译:Kleene 基于其 S1- S9 计算方法的可计算性理论基于其 S1- S9 计算方法的Kleene 依据其 S1- S9 计算方法的可计算性理论, 构成了使用任何有限类型物体进行计算的模式, 并扩展了图灵的“ 机器模型 ”, 以真实数字形式进行计算。 Kleene 框架的一个基本区别是正常功能和非正常功能之间的基本区别, 前者计算了相关的 Kleene 参数$\ expense {} $ 而后者没有。 从历史上看, 重点是正常功能, 但最近根据众所周知的理论研究了新的非正常功能, 比如真实数据的不可计算性。 这些新的非正常功能与Tait 的粉丝功能有根本的不同: 后者与 $\ decept=% 2} 函数是可计算, 而前者仅以 $\cremets% $ 3} 。 虽然在 $\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ $\\\\\\\\\\\ $ $ 3} distract $上存在很大的鸿沟, 但是 差异差异, 我们的示例, 我们的例子基于主流的数学等级概念。