Polyadic, or "multicast" social interaction networks arise when one sender addresses multiple receivers simultaneously. Currently available relational event models (REM) are not well suited to the analysis of polyadic interaction networks because they specify event rates for sets of receivers as functions of dyadic covariates associated with the sender and one receiver at a time. Relational hyperevent models (RHEM) address this problem by specifying event rates as functions of hyperedge covariates associated with the sender and the entire set of receivers. For instance, hyperedge covariates can express the tendency of senders to repeatedly address the same pairs (or larger sets) of receivers - a simple and frequent pattern in polyadic interaction data which, however, cannot be expressed with dyadic covariates. In this article we demonstrate the potential benefits of RHEMs for the analysis of polyadic social interaction. We define and discuss practically relevant effects that are not available for REMs but may be incorporated in empirical specifications of RHEM. We illustrate the empirical value of RHEM, and compare them with related REM, in a reanalysis of the canonical Enron email data.
翻译:当发件人同时处理多个接收者时,就会出现多偶或“多相”的社会互动网络。目前现有的关联事件模型(REM)并不非常适合分析多相互动网络,因为它们指定成套接收者的事件率为与发送者和一次接收者相关联的dyadic共变体的函数。 关系超常模式(RHEM)将事件率指定为与发件人和全套接收者相关联的顶端共变体的函数来解决这个问题。 例如, 高相联变体可以显示发件人反复处理相同对(或较大组)接收者的趋势—— 多元互动数据中的一种简单和常见的模式, 但是, 无法用 dyadic 共变体来表达这种模式。 在本篇文章中, 我们展示了RHEMs对分析多元社会互动的潜在好处。 我们定义并讨论与 RHEM无关但可能纳入 RHEM 经验性规范的实际相关影响。 我们演示了RHEM的经验价值, 并将它们与相关的 REM 比较, 在对罐式电子数据进行再分析时, 我们说明。