In order for artificial neural networks to begin accurately mimicking biological ones, they must be able to adapt to new exigencies without forgetting what they have learned from previous training. Lifelong learning approaches to artificial neural networks attempt to strive towards this goal, yet have not progressed far enough to be realistically deployed for natural language processing tasks. The proverbial roadblock of catastrophic forgetting still gate-keeps researchers from an adequate lifelong learning model. While efforts are being made to quell catastrophic forgetting, there is a lack of research that looks into the importance of class ordering when training on new classes for incremental learning. This is surprising as the ordering of "classes" that humans learn is heavily monitored and incredibly important. While heuristics to develop an ideal class order have been researched, this paper examines class ordering as it relates to priming as a scheme for incremental class learning. By examining the connections between various methods of priming found in humans and how those are mimicked yet remain unexplained in life-long machine learning, this paper provides a better understanding of the similarities between our biological systems and the synthetic systems while simultaneously improving current practices to combat catastrophic forgetting. Through the merging of psychological priming practices with class ordering, this paper is able to identify a generalizable method for class ordering in NLP incremental learning tasks that consistently outperforms random class ordering.
翻译:为了让人工神经网络开始准确地模仿生物网络,他们必须能够适应新的紧急需要,而不会忘记他们从以前的训练中学到了什么。 人工神经网络的终身学习方法试图实现这一目标,但进展还远远不够,无法现实地用于自然语言处理任务。 灾难性的遗漏的古老障碍仍然使研究人员能够从适当的终身学习模式中保持大门。 虽然正在努力消除灾难性的遗忘,但缺乏研究,在培训新课程以进行递增学习时,班级顺序安排很重要。 令人惊讶的是,人类学习的新课程的“班级”的订单受到严密监测,而且极为重要。 虽然研究过开发理想班级秩序的超常性课程,但本文考察了班级秩序,因为它与逐步的班级学习计划有关。 通过研究人类中发现的各种边缘方法之间的联系,以及这些方法如何在终身机器学习中仍然被误导,本文使人们更好地了解我们的生物系统与合成系统之间的相似之处,同时改进了当前消除灾难性记忆的做法。 通过将这一班级的不断升级的班级与不断升级的班级学习方法进行整合,从而确定不断升级的班级的班级学习。