We disentangle structural breaks in dynamic factor models by establishing a projection based equivalent representation theorem which decomposes any break into a rotational change and orthogonal shift. Our decomposition leads to the natural interpretation of these changes as a change in the factor variance and loadings respectively, which allows us to formulate two separate tests to differentiate between these two cases, unlike the pre-existing literature at large. We derive the asymptotic distributions of the two tests, and demonstrate their good finite sample performance. We apply the tests to the FRED-MD dataset focusing on the Great Moderation and Global Financial Crisis as candidate breaks, and find evidence that the Great Moderation may be better characterised as a break in the factor variance as opposed to a break in the loadings, whereas the Global Financial Crisis is a break in both. Our empirical results highlight how distinguishing between the breaks can nuance the interpretation attributed to them by existing methods.
翻译:我们通过建立基于预测的等效代表性理论,分解任何分解到旋转变化和正方位变化的分解模式,从而分解动态要素模型中的结构性断裂。我们的分解导致自然地将这些变化解释为分别改变因数差异和负荷的分别变化,从而使我们能够制定两种不同的测试,以区分这两种情况,而不同于现有的一般文献。我们得出两种测试的无症状分布,并展示其良好的有限样本性能。我们把测试应用到FRED-MD数据集中,以大温和全球金融危机为重点,作为候选人的突破,并找到证据,证明“大温和度”可能更好地被描述为因数差异的断裂,而不是负载的断裂,而“全球金融危机”则是两者的断裂。我们的经验结果突显了两种断裂之间的区分如何细化现有方法赋予它们的解释。</s>