We develop the analysis (cosparse) variant of the popular audio declipping algorithm of Siedenburg et al. Furthermore, we extend it by the possibility of weighting the time-frequency coefficients. We examine the audio reconstruction performance of several combinations of weights and shrinkage operators. We show that weights improve the reconstruction quality in some cases; however, the overall scores achieved by the non-weighted are not surpassed. Yet, the analysis Empirical Wiener (EW) shrinkage was able to reach the quality of a computationally more expensive competitor, the Persistent Empirical Wiener (PEW). Moreover, the proposed analysis variant using PEW slightly outperforms the synthesis counterpart in terms of an auditory-motivated metric.
翻译:我们开发了Siedenburg等人流行的音频解密算法的分析(粗略)变体。此外,我们通过加权时间-频率系数的可能性来扩展这一变体。我们研究了数种重量和收缩操作器组合的音频重建性能。我们发现,权重在某些情况下提高了重建质量;然而,非加权算法所取得的总得分并没有超过。然而,“Emp经验-维纳(EW)”的收缩分析能够达到计算成本更高的竞争者(PEEW)的质量。 此外,使用PEW的拟议的分析变体在听力驱动指标方面略高于合成对应方。