Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group discrimination -- they may discriminate against qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of discrimination can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.
翻译:在各种甄选过程中,越来越多地使用筛选分类方法来确定合格的候选人。在这方面,最近已经表明,如果对分类方法进行校准,人们可以确定最小的一组候选人,这些候选人中预期会含有所需数量的合格候选人,使用门槛决定规则。这有利于注重校准,作为筛选分类方法的唯一要求。在本文中,我们争辩说,使用校准分类方法的筛选政策可能受到群体内部歧视一类研究不足的影响 -- -- 它们可能歧视有兴趣的人口群体中的合格成员。此外,我们争辩说,如果分类方法满足群体内部的单一性,即每个群体中自然的单一性财产,那么这种歧视是可以避免的。然后,我们采用基于动态编程的高效后处理算法,尽量减少对给定的校准分类方法的修改,使其概率估计符合群体内部的单一性。我们用美国普查调查数据验证我们的算法,并表明,在预测颗粒度和短列表大小方面,集团内部的单一性往往以很小的成本实现。