Physical unclonable functions (PUFs), physical objects that are practically unclonable because of their andom and uncontrollable manufacturing variations, are becoming increasingly popular as security primitives and unique identifiers in a fully digitized world. One of the central PUF premises states that both friends and foes, both legitimate manufacturers and external attackers alike, cannot clone a PUF, producing two instances that are the same. Using the latest nanofabrication techniques, we show that this premise is not always met: We demonstrate the possibility of effective PUF duplication through sophisticated manufacturers by producing 63 copies of a non-trivial optical scattering structure which exhibit essentially the same scattering behavior. The remaining minuscule differences are close to or below noise levels, whence the duplicates have to be considered fully equivalent from a PUF perspective. The possibility for manufacturer-based optical PUF duplication has positive and negative consequences at the same time: While fully breaking the security of certain schemes, it enables new applications, too. For example, it facilitates unforgeable labels for valuable items; the first key-free group identification schemes over digital networks; or new types of encryption/decryption devices that do not contain secret keys.
翻译:在完全数字化的世界中,由于本身和无法控制的制造变化而实际上无法调节的物理功能(PUF),这些物理物体作为安全原始物和独特的识别器越来越受欢迎,在完全数字化的世界中,它们作为安全原始物和独特的识别器越来越受欢迎。 中央PUF的一处房地表明,无论是朋友还是敌人,无论是合法制造商还是外部攻击者,都不能克隆PUF,它们产生两个相同的情况。 我们使用最新的纳米制造技术,我们表明这一前提并非总能达到:我们通过先进的制造商来证明PUF的有效重复的可能性,我们生产了63份基本上显示相同散射行为的非三边光学分布结构。 剩余的微小差异接近或低于噪音水平,而从PUF的角度来看,重复必须完全等同。 制造商光学 PUF重复的可能性具有积极和消极的后果: 在完全打破某些计划的安全性的同时,它也允许新的应用。 例如,它为贵重物品提供了不可追溯的标签; 在数字网络上, 或新型的加密/制式的钥匙装置。