We consider an agent community wishing to decide on several binary issues by means of issue-by-issue majority voting. For each issue and each agent, one of the two options is better than the other. However, some of the agents may be confused about some of the issues, in which case they may vote for the option that is objectively worse for them. A benevolent external party wants to help the agents to make better decisions, i.e., select the majority-preferred option for as many issues as possible. This party may have one of the following tools at its disposal: (1) educating some of the agents, so as to enable them to vote correctly on all issues, (2) appointing a subset of highly competent agents to make decisions on behalf of the entire group, or (3) guiding the agents on how to delegate their votes to other agents, in a way that is consistent with the agents' opinions. For each of these tools, we study the complexity of the decision problem faced by this external party, obtaining both NP-hardness results and fixed-parameter tractability results.
翻译:我们考虑的是希望以逐个问题多数投票的方式决定几个二元问题的代理商群体。 对于每个问题和每个代理商来说,两种选择中有一个比另一个更好。但是,有些代理商可能对某些问题感到困惑,在这种情况下,他们可能会投票支持客观上更糟糕的选择。一个善意的外部当事人希望帮助代理商作出更好的决定,即为尽可能多的问题选择多数偏好的选择。该当事人可能拥有以下一种工具:(1) 教育某些代理商,使他们能够对所有问题进行正确的投票,(2) 任命一组高度胜任的代理商代表整个集团作出决定,或(3) 指导代理商如何以符合代理商意见的方式将他们的选票委托给其他代理商。我们研究这些工具中的每一种,我们研究该外部当事人所面临的决定问题的复杂性,既取得NP困难的结果,又取得固定分数的可选性结果。