Social Robotics and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research relies on different Affective Computing (AC) solutions for sensing, perceiving and understanding human affective behaviour during interactions. This may include utilising off-the-shelf affect perception models that are pre-trained on popular affect recognition benchmarks and directly applied to situated interactions. However, the conditions in situated human-robot interactions differ significantly from the training data and settings of these models. Thus, there is a need to deepen our understanding of how AC solutions can be best leveraged, customised and applied for situated HRI. This paper, while critiquing the existing practices, presents four critical lessons to be noted by the hitchhiker when applying AC for HRI research. These lessons conclude that: (i) The six basic emotions categories are irrelevant in situated interactions, (ii) Affect recognition accuracy (%) improvements are unimportant, (iii) Affect recognition does not generalise across contexts, and (iv) Affect recognition alone is insufficient for adaptation and personalisation. By describing the background and the context for each lesson, and demonstrating how these lessons have been learnt, this paper aims to enable the hitchhiker to successfully and insightfully leverage AC solutions for advancing HRI research.
翻译:社交机器人和人机交互(HRI)研究依赖于不同的情感计算(AC)解决方案,用于感知和理解人类在交互过程中的情感行为。这可能包括利用预先训练的通用情感识别模型,并将其直接应用于所处的实际情境。然而,交互过程中的条件与这些模型的训练数据和设置存在显著差异。因此,有必要深入了解如何最好地利用、定制和应用AC解决方案用于实践中的HRI。本文针对现有做法进行批判性评价,并提出四个搭便车者应注意的关键教训。这些教训包括:(i)六种基本情感类别在实践中无关紧要,(ii)提高情感识别准确率的百分比改进并不重要,(iii)情感识别无法跨越不同情境实现泛化,以及(iv)仅依靠情感识别是不足以实现自适应和个性化的。通过描述每个教训的背景和背景所在的环境,以及演示这些教训的学习经验,本文旨在让搭便车者成功地和深入地利用AC解决方案来推进HRI研究。