Proper testing of hypotheses requires adherence to the relevant assumptions on the data and model under consideration. It is of interest to see if specific hypothesis tests are robust to deviations from such assumptions. These topics have been extensively studied in classic parametric hypothesis testing. In turn, this work considers such questions for randomization tests. Specifically, are these nonparametric tests invariant or robust to the breaking of assumptions? In this work, general randomization tests are considered, which randomize data through application of group actions from some appropriately chosen compact topological group with respect to its Haar measure. It is shown that inferences made utilizing group actions coincides with standard distributional approaches. It is also shown that robustness is often asymptotically achievable even if the data does not necessarily satisfy invariance assumptions. Specific hypothesis tests are considered as examples. These are the one-sample location test and the group of reflections, the two-sample test for equality of means and the symmetric group of permutations, and the Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation and the special orthogonal group of n-dimensional rotations.
翻译:正确测试假设要求遵守关于所考虑的数据和模型的相关假设; 令人感兴趣的是,看具体假设测试是否对偏离这些假设具有很强的说服力; 这些专题在典型的参数假设测试中已经进行了广泛的研究; 这项工作反过来又考虑随机测试的这类问题; 具体地说,这些非参数测试是否与打破假设有关? 在这项工作中,一般随机化测试是考虑的,通过应用某些适当选择的精密表层组对其光学测量进行的集体行动随机化数据; 结果表明,利用群体行动的推断与标准的分布方法相吻合; 也表明,即使数据不一定满足变化假设,强性也往往无法在瞬间实现; 具体假设测试被视为例子, 它们是一模量位置测试和反省组、 手段平等和对称组的两种抽样测试, 以及 Durbin-Watson 序列相关性测试和正维旋转特殊组。