In supervised learning, an inductive learning algorithm extracts general rules from observed training instances, then the rules are applied to test instances. We show that this splitting of training and application arises naturally, in the classical setting, from a simple independence requirement with a physical interpretation of being non-signalling. Thus, two seemingly different definitions of inductive learning happen to coincide. This follows from the properties of classical information that break down in the quantum setup. We prove a quantum de Finetti theorem for quantum channels, which shows that in the quantum case, the equivalence holds in the asymptotic setting, that is, for large number of test instances. This reveals a natural analogy between classical learning protocols and their quantum counterparts, justifying a similar treatment, and allowing to inquire about standard elements in computational learning theory, such as structural risk minimization and sample complexity.
翻译:在监督的学习中,一种感性学习算法从观察的培训中提取一般规则,然后将规则应用于测试实例。我们表明,在古典环境中,这种培训和应用的分化自然地产生于简单的独立要求,对非符号进行物理解释。因此,两种看起来不同的感性学习定义发生重叠。这来自量子设置破裂的古典信息的特性。我们证明量子频道的量子 de Finetti理论,这表明在量子案例中,等值在无药可治的环境下,也就是在大量试验案例中,是相同的。这显示了古典学习协议与其量子对应方之间的自然类比,证明类似待遇是合理的,并允许查询计算学习理论的标准要素,例如结构风险最小化和抽样复杂性。