We present a basis for studying questions of cause and effect in statistics which subsumes and reconciles the models proposed by Pearl, Robins, Rubin and others, and which, as far as mathematical notions and notation are concerned, is entirely conventional. In particular, we show that, contrary to what several authors had thought, standard probability can be used to treat problems that involve notions of causality, and in a way not essentially different from the way it has been used in the area generally known (since the 1960s, at least) as 'applied probability'. Conventional, elementary proofs are given of some of the most important results obtained by the various schools of 'statistical causality', and a variety of examples considered by those schools are worked out in detail. Pearl's 'calculus of intervention' is examined anew, and its first two rules are formulated and proved by means of elementary probability for the first time since they were stated 25 years or so ago. Note: Corrected and extended parts of this paper will soon be published as a book of the same title.
翻译:我们提出了一个基础研究因果关系的统计学方法,它包含了Pearl、Robins、Rubin等人提出的各种模型,并且在数学概念和符号方面完全符合传统的规范。我们特别强调,与一些作者所认为的相反,标准概率可以用于处理牵涉到因果关系的问题,且在本质上与用于“应用概率”的学科领域没有本质的区别。我们提供了一些单一、基本的证明,证明了“统计因果关系”的各个分支取得的一些重要结果,并详细分析了这些分支研究中的一些典型案例。我们将重新审视Pearl的“干预计算法”,并且我们会首次使用简单的概率论证明该算法的首两条规则,自该规则被提出至今已有25年。注意:该论文的部分修正和扩展将很快出版成同名的书籍。