In the last decade, several organizations have produced documents intended to standardize, in the normative sense, and promote guidance to our recent and rapid AI development. However, the full spectrum of ideas presented in these documents has not yet been analyzed, except for a few meta-analyses and critical reviews of the field. In this work, we seek to expand on the work done by past researchers and create a tool for better data visualization of the contents and nature of these documents, to understand whether there is consensus or similarity between the principles espoused by various institutions, which may inspire debates on future regulations. We also provide some preliminary thoughts and questions that could guide the continuity of the research through a critical analysis of the results acquired by our methodology into a sample size of 200 documents.
翻译:在过去十年中,若干组织已编制文件,旨在规范规范,促进指导我们最近和迅速的AI发展,但除了少数元分析和对该领域的批判性审查外,尚未分析这些文件中提出的各种想法,我们在此工作中力求扩大过去研究人员所做的工作,并创造工具,更好地提供这些文件内容和性质的可视化数据,了解各机构所支持的原则之间是否有共识或相似之处,这可能会激发关于未来条例的辩论,我们还提出了一些初步想法和问题,通过对我们方法所获结果进行批判性分析,将200份文件样本纳入分析,以此指导研究工作的连续性。</s>