We study the problem of allocating indivisible chores to agents under the Maximin share (MMS) fairness notion. The chores are embedded on a graph and each bundle of chores assigned to an agent should be connected. Although there is a simple algorithm for MMS allocations of goods on trees, it remains open whether MMS allocations of chores on trees always exist or not, which is a simple but annoying problem in chores allocation. In this paper, we introduce a new method for chores allocation with connectivity constraints, called the group-satisfied method, that can show the existence of MMS allocations of chores on several subclasses of trees. Even these subcases are non-trivial and our results can be considered as a significant step to the open problem. We also consider MMS allocations of chores on cycles where we get the tight approximation ratio for three agents. Our result was obtained via the linear programming (LP) method, which enables us not only to compute approximate MMS allocations but also to construct tight examples of the nonexistence of MMS allocations without complicated combinatorial analysis. These two proposed methods, the group-satisfied method and the LP method, have the potential to solve more related problems.
翻译:我们研究将不可分割的家务劳动分配给在最大份额(MMS)公平概念下的代理商的问题,这些家务被嵌入一个图表,分配给代理商的每组家务应该连接起来。虽然在树上对MMS的物品分配有一个简单的算法,但对于MMS对树木的家务分配是否总是存在,这在家务分配方面是一个简单但令人烦恼的问题,我们的研究仍然是开放的。在本文中,我们引入了一种带有连通性限制的、称为集体满意的方法的家务分配新方法,这可以表明在几小类树木上存在着MMS的家务分配。即使是这些子案例也是非三角的,我们的结果也可以被视为是解决未决问题的一个重要步骤。我们还考虑MMS对三个代理商的周期的家务分配,我们通过线性编程(LP)方法取得了我们的结果,这使我们不仅能够计算近似MMS的分配,而且能够建立没有复杂组合分析的MMS分配的严格例子。这两种拟议方法、群体满意的方法和LP方法都有可能解决相关问题。</s>